Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Emerging aquatic insects can be an important resource subsidy for a variety of terrestrial consumers, including spiders, birds, bats and lizards. Emergence flux is influenced by a variety of abiotic and biotic variables, such as temperature, drying, and predators and these variables can also control the body size of emergent insects. Despite their importance, these variables can change rapidly during drought conditions as water temperatures rise, surface area decreases and predator densities increase.During 2018, the Konza Prairie Biological Station experienced a record drought: flow ceased in the lower reaches of Kings Creek for the first time in over 40 years of observation, leaving a series of isolated pools. We studied how the drought affected aquatic insect emergence in 12 of these pools via elevated temperatures, decreased surface area, and concentration of predators (e.g. fishes and crayfish) over a four‐week period. We returned in 2020 and sampled emergence in the same pools over 2 weeks under non‐drought conditions to compare emergence between drought and non‐drought conditions.We found three overall patterns: (1) rates of areal emergence abundance and biomass (number or mg DM m⁻²d⁻¹) did not differ between drought and non‐drought conditions. In contrast, pool‐scale emergence abundance, but not biomass (number or mg DM pool⁻¹d⁻¹), was lower during drought conditions; (2) average midge body size was larger during the drought relative to the non‐drought conditions; (3) environmental variables (e.g. temperature, pool surface area, predator biomass) were not predictive of emergence during drought and non‐drought conditions.Fewer, but larger emergent midges (as seen under drought conditions) may represent a higher quality resource for terrestrial consumers than many smaller midges due to increased per‐capita energy yield. However, due to the overall decrease in water availability throughout the stream network, the overall emergence flux was concentrated in reaches with remaining water during the drought, making pools emergence subsidy hotspots. Overall, these contrasting responses underscore the complex nature of community responses to shifting climatic conditions. 

Abstract Ecosystems that are coupled by reciprocal flows of energy and nutrient subsidies can be viewed as a single “meta‐ecosystem.” Despite these connections, the reciprocal flow of subsidies is greatly asymmetrical and seasonally pulsed. Here, we synthesize existing literature on stream–riparian meta‐ecosystems to quantify global patterns of the amount of subsidy consumption by organisms, known as “allochthony.” These resource flows are important since they can comprise a large portion of consumer diets, but can be disrupted by human modification of streams and riparian zones. Despite asymmetrical subsidy flows, we found stream and riparian consumer allochthony to be equivalent. Although both fish and stream invertebrates rely on seasonally pulsed allochthonous resources, we find allochthony varies seasonally only for fish, being nearly three times greater during the summer and fall than during the winter and spring. We also find that consumer allochthony varies with feeding traits for aquatic invertebrates, fish, and terrestrial arthropods, but not for terrestrial vertebrates. Finally, we find that allochthony varies by climate for aquatic invertebrates, being nearly twice as great in arid climates than in tropical climates, but not for fish. These findings are critical to understanding the consequences of global change, as ecosystem connections are being increasingly disrupted. 

Key Points We compared tools for describing streamflow timeseries, including streamflow metrics, wavelet, and Fourier analysis Each method indicated streamflow data are structured: variability at short timescales is negatively correlated with long timescales Globally, dams were less correlated with streamflow regime than catchment size and climate were